<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Katherine Emmons &#187; Tea Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.katherineemmons.com/tag/tea-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.katherineemmons.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:59:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tick &#8230; tick &#8230; tick &#8230; kaboom</title>
		<link>http://www.katherineemmons.com/2010/09/tick-tick-tick-kaboom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.katherineemmons.com/2010/09/tick-tick-tick-kaboom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>katherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milton Bradley's Time Bomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Noonan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katherineemmons.com/?p=2926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pre-Ramble: Peggy Noonan is a great writer, even when she&#8217;s wrong. Her piece on yesterday&#8217;s WSJ opinion page (A19) describes a now familiar exchange that took place in a town hall meeting in Washington last week&#8230; &#8220;A woman stands &#8212; handsome, dignified, black, a person with presence&#8230; The president looked relieved when she stood. Perhaps he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.katherineemmons.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/timebomb.gif" rel="wp-prettyPhoto[g2926]"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2929" title="Milton Bradley game, Time bomb" src="http://www.katherineemmons.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/timebomb.gif" alt="" width="170" height="225" /></a>Pre-Ramble:</strong> Peggy Noonan is a great writer, even when she&#8217;s wrong. Her piece on yesterday&#8217;s <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703384204575510283851292698.html?KEYWORDS=%22The+Enraged+vs+the+Exhausted%22" target="_blank">WSJ opinion page </a>(A19) describes a now familiar exchange that took place in a town hall meeting in Washington last week&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;A woman stands &#8212; handsome, dignified, black, a person with presence&#8230; The president looked relieved when she stood. Perhaps he thought she might lob a sympathetic question that would allow him to hit a reply out of the park. Instead, in the nicest way possible, Velma Hart lobbed a hand grenade.  </em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;I am a mother. I am a wife. I&#8217;m an American veteran, and I&#8217;m one of your middle-class Americans. And quite frankly I&#8217;m exhausted. I&#8217;m exhausted of defending you, defending your administration, defending the mantle of change that I voted for, and deeply disappointed with where we are.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Noonan goes on to dissect the moment, angling her words around the &#8221;disastrous fall&#8221; that has become the Obama Presidency. Then she jumps horses a bit and points to the rise of women and new access to good ol&#8217; Washington inside information as major developments that are going to shape election outcomes going forward. The words are saying that women and outsiders will play a new role in American politics, but the subtext is &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Democrats are going to lose big in the next election because Barack Obama campaign-promised that he would fix things, and he hasn&#8217;t.  He is responsible for all of the things that aren&#8217;t going well in our country &#8230; and in the world, &#8230; Watch out because the brave new Tea Party Girls are deeply disappointed and we are going to toss our tea bags into a new cup.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Let&#8217;s be real about this &#8211; </strong>Republican or Democrat &#8211; regardless of which party you&#8217;re steeped in, they&#8217;re both full of hot water.  The fact is, all kinds of hurt would have been visited upon whoever was sitting in that Oval Office &#8230; Barack Obama &#8230; John McCain &#8230; Hillary Clinton, &#8230; heck, even Betty White would be taking a hard right to the chin on the breadth and depth of stuff that&#8217;s been going down lately. </p>
<p><strong>The Take-Away:</strong> Like that goofy vintage Milton Bradley game, <em>Time Bomb</em>, this big mess was going to blow; it was just a matter of who was holding the ticking ball when it went off. Sure, we can be &#8220;disappointed about where we are,&#8221; even deeply, but we can&#8217;t hold one man singularly accountable for taking the oath of office moments before the teetering mass of cumulative missteps went KABOOM!!! in our faces.</p>
<p><strong>Post Note:</strong> <em>The Time Bomb game was released in 1964 by Milton-Bradley. Based on the schoolyard game of Hot Potato, players would gather in a circle, wind it up and start tossing the ticking ball from person to person. Suddenly, the ball would make a popping sound and whoever was holding it was eliminated from the game.</em></p>
<p><em>Time Bomb is hard to find these days, especially in good condition as the premise of the game involved tossing and the product was targeted for kids – human beings with under-developed motor skills. Expect to blow $50-$75 on a clean working example of this toy. (Adapted from description found on the Big Red Toy Box website)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katherineemmons.com/2010/09/tick-tick-tick-kaboom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political grind</title>
		<link>http://www.katherineemmons.com/2010/03/political-grind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.katherineemmons.com/2010/03/political-grind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>katherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coffee Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Bunning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katherineemmons.com/?p=2359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pre-Ramble:  As if I didn&#8217;t love coffee and parties enough already, it appears that there is a political movement afoot that is named after both &#8212; The Coffee Party. The Coffee Party, floating the slogan, &#8220;Wake Up and Stand Up,&#8221; pledges to &#8220;support positive solutions and hold accountable those who obstruct them.&#8221; ( &#8230; Are you listening Senator Bunning?) Founder [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2360" title="Coffee Party logo" src="http://www.katherineemmons.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Coffee-Party.jpg" alt="Coffee Party logo" width="200" height="173" />Pre-Ramble:</strong>  As if I didn&#8217;t love coffee and parties enough already, it appears that there is a political movement afoot that is named after both &#8212; The Coffee Party.</p>
<p><strong>The Coffee Party,</strong> floating the slogan, &#8220;<em>Wake Up and Stand Up</em>,&#8221; pledges to &#8220;support positive solutions and hold accountable those who obstruct them.&#8221; ( &#8230; Are you listening Senator Bunning?) Founder Annabel Park clearly articulates the Coffee Party civic participation model,</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;The federal government is not the enemy of the people, but rather it is the expression of our collective will &#8230; We must participate in the democratic process in order to address the challenges we face &#8230;&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Established in response to the sniping, hyper-extended pinkies of the conservative Tea Party movement, the Coffee Party &#8212; a notion that has been brewing for a long time &#8212; appears to be more about process than a particular political agenda. With Sarah Palin at the head of the table wagging her finger at every Democratic tic that she can find in the cross-hairs, the conservative Tea Party seems to be steeped in the unrequited politics of a failed GOP platform, as much as it is about any kind of meaningful change.</p>
<p><strong>Same old grind</strong> &#8211; Basically, whether we&#8217;re sipping coffee, tea or Kool Aid, nothing is going to get done in Washington, on either side of the aisle, until the folks we&#8217;ve elected to get stuff done stop bickering and posturing and titting and tatting and start actually getting stuff done.  &#8230; Are you listening, Senator Bunning?  Annabel Parks calls it again,</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;We&#8217;ve got to send a message to people in Washington that you have to learn how to work together &#8230; You have to learn how to talk about issues without acting like you&#8217;re in [a face-off]. We need to roll up our sleeves, put our heads together and work it out &#8230; that&#8217;s the American way of doing this.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>The Take-Away:</strong> So, grab a cup o&#8217;Joe &#8211; it&#8217;s time to consider a broader concept of democracy. We need a more balanced, bi-partisan approach to our profoundly stuck, elitist and ineffective political scenario &#8230; and, <em><strong>We the People</strong></em> are the ones who need to <strong>step it up</strong> &#8211; individually and collectively, to own both the process and the outcome and do what we can to hold our elected public servants accountable for <strong>our </strong>agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katherineemmons.com/2010/03/political-grind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One lump or two?</title>
		<link>http://www.katherineemmons.com/2010/02/one-lump-or-two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.katherineemmons.com/2010/02/one-lump-or-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>katherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Bayh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[folding chairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madhatter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katherineemmons.com/?p=2294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pre-Ramble:  So, I guess Sarah Palin had a tea party last week.  I wasn&#8217;t invited.  As a registered Independent for the last 25 years, I&#8217;m not invited to vote in the primaries either. Well, so, in our perennially polarized political system, the majority is either swinging way over to the right &#8230; or they&#8217;re swung way over to the left [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2296" title="Madhatter's Tea Party" src="http://www.katherineemmons.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/aliceteapartysmall-1.png" alt="Madhatter's Tea Party" width="435" height="348" />Pre-Ramble:</strong>  So, I guess Sarah Palin had a tea party last week.  I wasn&#8217;t invited.  As a registered Independent for the last 25 years, I&#8217;m not invited to vote in the primaries either.</p>
<p>Well, so, in our perennially polarized political system, the majority is either swinging way over to the right &#8230; or they&#8217;re swung way over to the left &#8230; and the folks in the middle pretty much get knocked out of the way.  The outcome of this &#8221;pendulum politics&#8221; is that nothing of substance ever seems to get done.</p>
<p><strong>Just the ticket</strong> &#8211; If candidates who want to get elected camp out in the middle (you know who you are) because there are so many votes there, why don&#8217;t we formalize that group?  Maybe there&#8217;s room in the system for a third party?  &#8230; Ya think?</p>
<p><strong>The Take-Away:</strong>  I have a great idea &#8230; rather than just taking our  lumps, let&#8217;s set up a couple rows of folding chairs in the center of The Aisle?  ( &#8230; <em>Independent Party on the Aisle!!</em>  <em>Woot!!</em> ) &#8230; I&#8217;m not sure how many we&#8217;ll need &#8230;  I want one &#8230; and we probably need one for Senator Bayh &#8230; and a couple of seats for my neighbors &#8230;</p>
<p>Let me know if you want a spot and I&#8217;ll toss my coat over it until you get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katherineemmons.com/2010/02/one-lump-or-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

